By Cameron Horton
In psychology, attribution theory—introduced by psychologist Fritz Heider—examines how we interpret events by assigning them to specific causes. It shapes everything from how we react to social situations to how we make decisions about resource allocation.
In marketing, the logic is similar: we want to understand how our channels and campaigns influence consumer behavior and actually drive conversions. This way, we can allocate spend where it truly matters. That’s the essence of revenue attribution—especially B2B attribution, where longer buying cycles make it critical to prove which touchpoints move the needle.
But here’s the kicker: most purported “attribution” solutions fall short because they don’t incorporate cost data or provide transparency into how credit is assigned. That leaves you with a skewed view of which campaigns are “working”—leading to misallocated budget and missed opportunities.
As Ryan Koonce, Chief Executive Officer of Attribution, puts it: “The primary problem that most marketers run into is they’ve actually never seen attribution that works…anything that uses Google Tag Manager or the Google infrastructure doesn’t provide transparency. You can’t see cost—ever.”
Revenue attribution is the process of mapping each deal’s revenue back to the marketing efforts that helped create that deal. Think of it as a microscope into your entire funnel, revealing every interaction’s role along the customer journey. Instead of looking at marketing metrics like click-through rates or page views in isolation, revenue attribution ties those metrics to actual revenue outcomes.
In B2B, attribution is particularly challenging. The buyer’s journey can include multiple individuals, online and offline touchpoints, and marketing channels—like landing pages, email marketing, display ads, in-person conferences, and even interactions with sales teams—across weeks or even months, from first awareness all the way to a signed contract.
Without properly attributing revenue to these interactions, you risk dramatically underestimating or overestimating the effectiveness of certain channels.
In other words, accurate revenue attribution is fundamental for understanding your ROI and optimizing efforts that truly deliver results.
ROI Dashboard within Attribution
3 Components of Accurate Revenue Attribution
Achieving real, reliable revenue attribution doesn’t happen by accident. It requires a deliberate setup that captures the full cost-and-revenue picture. Below are the core components every organization needs.
You can’t effectively attribute revenue if you’re missing pieces of the user journey. B2B buyers might click ads on LinkedIn, follow up with an organic search, download a whitepaper through Facebook remarketing, and finally attend a field event. Collecting every significant touchpoint ensures you see the journey from start to finish.
Moreover, systems like Google Analytics can be limited by last-click or session-based logic. To nail multitouch attribution, you need to aggregate all web, ad, organic, and offline interactions, stitching them back to unique users and accounts if you’re in a B2B environment.
“Most tools can’t tie user-level data to costs. They rely on platform-reported conversions that don’t add up when you try to combine them.” – Ryan Koonce, CEO of Attribution
Transparency is crucial for trust. Many “black-box” attribution solutions simply spit out results with zero visibility into how credit was allocated or how data was collected. That makes it impossible to validate your model or catch errors.
If your system claims a certain campaign influenced 40% of the revenue for a closed deal, you should be able to delve into the underlying data to confirm how that figure was derived. That’s the big missing piece—when it comes to transparency, most systems don’t allow you to access or audit the underlying raw data.
Cost data is the missing link in many attribution models. If you spend $10 across all channels to make $8, your net return is negative—even if each channel tries to claim partial credit for those $8.
A robust revenue attribution platform must pull in cost data from each ad platform (LinkedIn, Google, Facebook, etc.) to give you a real ROI calculation. Otherwise, you might misunderstand your true returns and sink budget into unprofitable channels.
Not all attribution is created equal. There are various models—some simpler than others—and each has its place. Below is a run-down of the most common methods.
That said, there isn’t a perfect attribution model out there. The right one depends on your sales process and what your business actually needs—i.e., your priorities.
You know the importance of cross-channel data, transparency, and cost. Now let’s explore specific, practical steps to make sure your revenue attribution is airtight and drives real ROI improvements.
In-App MTA Reporting with Attribution
Robust revenue attribution requires real-time or near-real-time integration with your ad platforms (Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, etc.). This ensures that every click, impression, and cost figure is fed into your central attribution system.
By automatically syncing spend data—and linking those costs to the specific users and accounts you close—you’ll see exactly which campaigns make money and which fall short. This eliminates guesswork and guards against misreporting.
The Drum recently explored how marketers are handling the complex topic of attribution. One marketer highlighted, “No single KPI can adequately identify success. Instead, we encourage every brand to develop a custom measurement framework consisting of media data, business data, and advanced measurement studies.” And that holds true for revenue attribution.
Each company has unique goals, buying cycles, and user behaviors. A rigid, one-size-fits-all attribution model may not fully reflect how your business grows revenue.
Attribution Model Comparison within Attribution
For instance, in a PLG SaaS business, every interaction leading up to a free trial start matters—even if there’s no revenue event for two weeks afterward.
Look for a platform that lets you adjust how touches are weighted or even create rules to ignore specific types of interactions (e.g., direct traffic). Customizing your approach ensures you don’t fall into oversimplification—like attributing everything to the last ad clicked right before a deal closes, ignoring months of nurturing.
By 2028, the Customer Data Platform (CDP) market is expected to reach an impressive USD 28.2 billion, rising at a CAGR of 39.9%—and it’s understandable why.
A CDP can serve as the foundation for comprehensive marketing attribution. CDPs unify first-party data across various channels in real-time, giving you a single source of truth for marketing and product interactions.
When you feed complete, user-level data from your CDP into a full-featured attribution system that also captures cost, you get both 360° audience insight and complete ROI visibility. In other words, you’ll actually know how each user engaged with your brand from the first ad click to the final closed-won deal—and what it cost at every step.
Think of your attribution model as a living process. You won’t get it perfect on the first try. Part of attributing revenue accurately involves periodically auditing your data to confirm that the dollars and cents match up with your internal records, pipeline reports, or CRM data.
A thorough audit might reveal that certain channels are double-counting conversions or that an offline event was credited incorrectly. Catching these errors early is critical—otherwise, you risk making sizable budget decisions based on flawed assumptions.
Probabilistic attribution often relies on algorithms or statistical models that estimate how credit should be assigned, usually due to data gaps.
Here’s the problem: Since probabilistic attribution relies on probability estimates, it can be less accurate than concrete data points. As consumer buying patterns evolve, these models need continuous retraining to adjust probabilities and maintain their accuracy.
Additionally, they don’t support tracking individual consumer paths to purchase, leaving those journeys unclear. Lastly, counts of impressions or ad clicks can be unreliable, affecting the overall accuracy of your attribution insights.
Deterministic attribution, on the other hand, uses actual user-level data and unique identifiers (e.g., user IDs, cookies, email addresses) to precisely show which touches belong to which deal. When possible, go with a deterministic approach (or a combination of both).
This reduces guesswork and ensures your understanding of each channel’s role is grounded in real interaction data.
To tie this all together, we’ll walk through examples of revenue attribution gone wrong in the wild—and then show you how to do it right.
Let’s say your team invests heavily in a new Facebook campaign that’s driving a ton of clicks. You launch a new discount offer and see conversions roll in. Focusing on last-click attribution alone, Facebook appears to be killing it, so you think it deserves a bigger slice of your budget.
What you don’t realize is that most of these “conversions” were primed by an earlier LinkedIn campaign plus a series of targeted email drips. Worse yet, you never pulled cost data, so you have no idea that you paid far more per acquisition than you thought. You end up funneling more budget into a channel that drives expensive leads while shutting down smaller campaigns that effectively contribute in earlier stages.
In contrast, imagine linking all your marketing campaigns—and their respective cost data—to a central attribution platform. You use a multitouch model that allocates partial credit to early LinkedIn touchpoints, email campaigns, and the final Facebook offer.
You quickly see that although Facebook final touches get the credit for sealed deals, the earlier LinkedIn ad and subsequent email nurture are driving the lion’s share of qualified traffic. Your final cost-per-acquisition (and cost-per-opportunity) data shows that LinkedIn plus email is much more cost-effective than the final Facebook push.
Armed with this real data, you re-balance your budget to emphasize the LinkedIn and email strategy that’s proven to deliver a better ROI. Meanwhile, you tweak Facebook ads to target only prospects who’ve already engaged with your brand in some way, ensuring you’re not overspending on top-of-funnel clicks. That’s an example of revenue attribution done right.
Most marketers rely on either first-touch or last-touch attribution, which assigns all the credit to a single channel.
However, if you’re ready to see the full story behind your marketing efforts—and do more of what really works—take the leap to a customized multitouch attribution system. Your future self (and your leadership team) will thank you.
Return on Ad Spend by Cohort Within Attribution
Attribution is built on the premise that true, transparent, and cost-inclusive attribution is the missing link for modern B2B marketers. We know that every company has unique needs around their attribution modeling. And that’s why we offer the flexibility to customize your attribution model to fit your business.
Our platform gives you:
The result? Fewer blind spots, less guesswork, and a clearer path to higher ROI.
Most attribution systems overlook the cost side of the equation. They might show you which clicks or channels assisted conversions, but they’re blind to how much money was sunk into each touchpoint.
When you do it right, revenue attribution provides a clear picture of your entire marketing ecosystem throughout the buyer’s journey—one that goes beyond superficial vanity metrics or incorrectly credited conversions. Especially for B2B marketing teams with extended sales cycles, revenue attribution offers tangible insights into where to invest more (or less).
When revenue attribution is done right, marketing teams can trace revenue to specific campaigns or initiatives. By extension, they can confidently demonstrate how their campaigns or activities translate into actual bookings (generating revenue for the business).
In other words, accurate revenue attribution is the difference between identifying real growth levers and making decisions based on half-truths.
Some companies prefer a linear model that treats all touches equally, while others may opt for a position-based, like a U-shaped model. The key is to choose—or build—a custom revenue attribution model (ideally multitouch) that mirrors your actual sales process and can be adjusted to fit new data or changing business priorities.
Attribution integrates cost data from all major ad platforms, pulls in detailed user-level data, and gives you the ability to customize how credit is assigned. We eliminate the “black box” problem by letting you see exactly how each touchpoint was credited. This allows you to measure true ROI across channels, campaigns, and funnel stages—without the guesswork.
Conversion tracking usually focuses on a single event, like a form-fill or e-commerce checkout. Revenue attribution goes further: it connects those conversions to your ultimate revenue outcomes, factoring in multiple touches and the actual cost of each. In short, conversion tracking is just one piece of the puzzle—revenue attribution compiles the whole puzzle.
Navigating Through Walled Gardens in Commerce Most ecommerce platforms operate as walled gardens, holding large…
Your marketing efforts may be measured on a specific set of outcomes, such as more…
In today's fast-paced digital landscape, businesses are constantly seeking ways to gain deeper insights into…
